Badri Prasad Sahu v. Janak Prasad Pathak
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner in a contempt petition submitted that the impugned order had been complied with. Consequently, the Judge dismissed the petition for not being pressed.
The petitioner in a contempt petition submitted that the impugned order had been complied with. Consequently, the Judge dismissed the petition for not being pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 63 of 2020
---- Petitioner
Versus
| ---- Respondent | |
|---|---|
| 20.01.2020 | Mr. Govind Dewangan, Counsel for the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order has been complied with, therefore, the petitioner do not want to press this contempt petition. |
| In view of the above submission, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Yasmin
Badri Prasad Sahu
Janak Prasad Pathak
Bajrang Dubey
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court