Disposed

Janki Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC2 Nov 2020WPS/2293/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition concerning the petitioner's unissued Kramonnati benefits after directing her to submit a detailed representation to specific respondents for scrutiny within four months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to submit detailed representation to Respondents No. 3 and 5; respondents to pass order within 4 months; writ petition disposed.

Janki Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 2293 of 2020

¶5

Janki Sahu W/o Rajkumar Sahu Aged About 41 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Sirshi, Block Bhagbahara, District Mahasamund R/o VillageWard No. 2 Durga Nagar, Bhagbahara District -Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

¶9

Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

¶10

District Education Officer Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh,

¶11

Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶12

Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Bhagbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Block Education Officer Bhagbahara, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr. Waquar Naiyer, Advocate For State : Mrs. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order

2-11-2020

The limited grievance of the petitioner is that, she is entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which she has completed but they have not been given the same till date.

¶21

Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioner make detailed representation in this regard to Respondents No. 3 & 5 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the Rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

¶23

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri)

¶24

Raju

Janki Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janki Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nohar Singh Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Kumar Netam Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jayvati Marapi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tekram Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Alakhram Andilya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Nagmani Vs State of Chhattisgarh