In a writ petition challenging Labour and Industrial Court orders directing reinstatement, the High Court disposed of the matter as the workman had attained superannuation and the employer had already effected reinstatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPL No. 6262 of 2009
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
Shri Ratan Pusty, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
Order On Board
13/2/2020
attained the age of superannuation. Even otherwise, the petitioner/employer has not led any evidence before the Industrial Court to prove the misconduct alleged against the workman.
Sd/-
Judge
Gowri
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation
Khilawan Prasad Sahu
M.P. Road Transport Corporation
Industrial Court Of Chhattisgarh
The Presiding Officer, Labour Court
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
