Dr.Girish Pandey v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the cause of action had ceased to exist.
The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the cause of action had ceased to exist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 2500 of 2009
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner Shri A. K. Shukla and Shri Atanu Ghosh, Advocates
For Respondent-State Shri Rajendra Tripathi, PL
Hon'ble Justice Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
06/02/2020
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge
Nirala
Dr. Girish Pandey
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court