In SA No. 382 of 2010, Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal heard the second appeal via video conference. The court dismissed the appeal due to lack of instructions from the learned counsel for the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 382 of 2010
Radheshyam Vishwakarma S/o Late Rambharaos Vishwakarma, R/o Takhatpur, TahsilTakhatpur, Tahsil Chowk Kailashnagar, District- Bilaspur, C.G.---- Appellant
Versus
1. Smt. Monika Agrawal W/o Shri Nitesh Agrawal, aged about 30 years, Caste Agrawal (Marwadi), R/o Vinova Nagar, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, C.G.
2. Nitesh Agrawal, S/o Shri Shankar Agrawal, aged about 35 years, R/o Vinoba Nagar behind Gayatri Mandir Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, C.G.
3. Vijay Bharat Sahu, aged about 35 years, Occupation Patwari, Patwari Halka No.14 Mohtari & Patwari Halka No.1 R.I.C., Tahsil & District Bilaspur C.G.
4. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector, Bilaspur, C.G.
---- Respondents
For Appellant :- Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate.
For State/Respondent:- Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G.
2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
17/09/2020
1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken
up through video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instruction on behalf of the appellant.
Accordingly, the instant second appeal is dismissed as having no instruction to learned counsel.Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Ankit
Radheshyam Vishwakarma
Monika Agrawal
Nitesh Agrawal
Vijay Bharat Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court