Allowed

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Aug 2020MCRC/5032/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to two applicants in custody for offences under Sections 328 and 34 IPC. The court considered the detention period and prosecution conduct, directing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety each for the like amount.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned court.

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheating and Forgery | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶2

MCRC No. 5032 of 2020

¶3

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai W/o. Ramadhin Sahu, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Village Muska, Police Station and Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon CG

¶4

Dilwati Sahu, W/o. Gulal Sahu, Aged about 48 years, R/o. Village Pendri, Police Station and Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg CG

¶5

---- Applicants

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Chhuikhadan, district Rajnandgaon CG

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Applicant : Shri Abhishek Sharma Advocate For Respondent /State : Shri Rahul Jha, GA

¶10

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

17/08/2020

¶13

The applicants have filed this application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as they are in custody in connection with Crime No. 146/2020 registered at police station Chhuikhadan district Rajnandgaon (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 328, 34 IPC.

¶14

As per prosecution case, the applicants have forcefully administered poison to the complainant.

¶15

Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. He submits that the applicants are in jail since 10.07.2020 and looking to the conduct of the prosecution it is clear that the trial will take time for its conclusion, therefore they may

¶16

be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶18

Having heard counsel for the parties, considered the totality of the fact, in particular the detention period of the applicants, I am inclined to release them on regular bail. Accordingly, their application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is allowed.

¶19

It is directed that in the event of the applicants' furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, they shall be released on bail.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶22

suguna

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jatot Balaji Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anup Singh Dhruwe & Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Durgesh Rathore & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mayank Thakur @ Dadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mayank Thakur Alias Dadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh