Allowed

Mayank Thakur Alias Dadu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Aug 2020MCRC/4271/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment relates to a bail application filed by an accused in a theft case. The High Court considered the nature of the offence, the pendency of the trial, and the fact that nothing was seized from the applicant. The court allowed the bail application.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was directed to be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one local surety.

Mayank Thakur Alias Dadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 4271 of 2020

¶5

Mayank Thakur @ Dadu, S/o Khomlal Thakur, Aged About 18 Years, R/o House No. 112/H, Risali Sector, Bhilai, Near BSF Office, P.S.Nevai, Tehsil & District- Durg (C. G.).

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, Through- S.H.O. Nevai, District- Durg (C. G.). ---- Respondent

¶9

For Applicant : Mr. B. P. Singh, Adv. For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

¶10

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

17.08.2020

¶13

The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 148/2019 registered at Police Station- Nevai, District- Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411, 34 of IPC.

¶14

The prosecution story, in brief is that, complainant lodged a report alleging that on 17.06.2019, he went to his village along with his family members and on 19.06.2019, when he returned and found that some golden ornaments and silver ornaments were stolen by the unknown person. Thereafter, offence has been registered against the present applicant and he has been taken into custody.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed and nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.10.2019 and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, the present applicant may be

¶16

¶17

released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect. It is submitted that 12 other cases of same nature have been registered against the present applicant, therefore, no case is made out for grant of bail.

¶19

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶20

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, and further considering the facts that the charge-sheet has been filed and nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 12.10.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.

¶21

Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, with one local surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.

¶22

Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶23

Ruchi

Mayank Thakur Alias Dadu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayank Thakur Alias Dadu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gaurav Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jatot Balaji Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anup Singh Dhruwe & Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Durgesh Rathore & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Penbai Sahu @ Prembai Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mayank Thakur @ Dadu Vs State of Chhattisgarh