This is a second bail application filed by an accused in an acid attack case punishable under Sections 326-A and 34 of the IPC. The court rejected the application, citing the gravity of the crime, CCTV evidence, and the nature of the offence as reasons against bail.
Bail application under Section 439 CrPC rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3257 of 2020
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. C. R. Sahu, Adv. For Respondent/State : Ms. Sunita Jain, G. A.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order on Board
17.08.2020
2
complainant Sunil Kumar Sahu, because of which he got injured on his face and hand due to this acid attack. Based on this, offence has been registered. Present applicant has been taken into custody on 12.06.2019.
Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge
Ruchi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused accused under Sections 326-A and 34 of IPC is eligible for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC given the serious nature of the acid attack.
Whether release on bail can be granted when the accused is a main accused and offence is recorded in CCTV footage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satish Kumar Panariya
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
