The High Court of Chhattisgarh, in a prompt vacuum release application, held that since the applicant was already granted bail under Section 167 Cr.P.C., the instant MCRC became infructuous and was dismissed.
The instant MCRC was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 2124 of 2020
Ajay Yadu S/o Ramesh Yadu Aged About 28 Years R/o Kodwa, Police Station Bhatapara Gramin District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police Station Bhatapara Gramin District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.---- Respondent
For Applicant:- Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate.
For State/Respondent :- Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
09/07/2020
1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken
up through video conferencing.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits
that the applicant has already been granted
bail under Section 167 of the Cr.P.C.,
therefore, the instant MCRC has become
2
infrutuous.
3. Accordingly, the instant MCRC is dismissed
as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Ankit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the instant prompt vacuum release application for bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure is maintainable when bail has already been granted under Section 167 of the Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Yadu S/o Ramesh Yadu
State of Chhattisgarh through Station House Officer, Police Station Bhatapara
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court