Coalition of circumstances refuses entry to a fourth bail application due to lack of new grounds. The court rejects the plea but directs the trial court to conclude proceedings within six months.
Fourth bail application rejected; trial directed to conclude within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C.No.4282 of 2020
---- Applicant Versus
---Non-applicant
For Applicant :Mr. Jitendra Nath Nande, Advocate For Non-applicant :Mr. HS Ahluwalia, Dy. Advocate General
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
09.7.2020.
2
withdrawn with liberty to file the same after examination of material witnesses vide order dated 23.7.2018 in M.Cr.C. No.4136 of 2018, second bail application of the applicant was rejected by this Court on 21.6.2019 in M.Cr.C. No.921/2019 and the third bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2020 in M.Cr.C. No.6642 of 2019.
of this order.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE
Bini
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a fourth bail application should be entertained in a fourth booking for offences under the NDPS Act when no new ground or change in circumstances exists.
Whether the trial court should be directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sarvesh Manhar @ Konda @ Bablu
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
