The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as withdrawn after the petitioner sought liberty to approach the District Magistrate for interim custody of a vehicle.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to move District Magistrate for custody of vehicle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Cr.M.P.No.240 of 2020
Sandeep Singh Rajput S/o. Shri Brijbhushan Singh Rajput,
aged about 36 years, R/o.-Village-Amlidih, Police Station
and Tahsil Gharghoda, and District – Raigarh (CG)
---- Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through the District Collector,
Raigarh, District – Raigarh (CG)
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr.Abhishek Saraf, Advocate
For Respondent :Mr.Akash Pandey, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
07.02.2020
1. After arguing for fairly long time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of subsequent events he may be granted permission to move before the concerned District Magistrate for grant of interim custody of the vehicle.
2. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
the aforesaid liberty in favour of the petitioner.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K.Agrawal)
Judge
B/-
Sandeep Singh Rajput
State of Chhattisgarh Through the District Collector, Raigarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court