Allowed

Vishal Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Dec 2020CRMP/1437/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court corrected a typographical error in a prior bail order of M.Cr.C. No. 7493 of 2020. The court clarified that the bail was granted subject to a bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, treating the earlier mention of rejection as a clerical mistake.

What did the court decide?

Corrected paragraph 8 of the prior order to reflect grant of bail on personal and surety bond of Rs. 25,000; disposed of the present writ petition.

Vishal Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Cr.M.P. No. 1437 of 2020

¶5

Vishal Kumar Singh S/o Shri Mritunjay Singh, Aged About 23 Years R/o Shivanand Nagar, Khamtarai, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Khamtarai, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

Office Reference

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant ORDER

¶12

04.12.2020

¶13

Heard.

¶14

By this office reference, the Registry has pointed out that M.Cr.C. No.7493 of 2020 was allowed vide order dated 2.12.2020 but in the operative part there is a typographical mistake committed showing that the application was rejected.

¶15

On perusal of the order in M.Cr.C. No. 7493 of 2020 dated 2.12.2020, it is found that this Court after considering the submissions in paragraph 7 of the order has made opinion for granting bail to the applicant. Therefore, the part of the order in paragraph 8 mentioning rejection of bail application is erroneous and that is a typographical mistake, in which there should have been typed the terms and conditions for grant of bail. As the correction in the same would not amount to review of the order passed, therefore, the request made in the PUD is allowed.

¶16

¶17

It is ordered that instead of reading the contents of paragraph 8 in the order dated 2.12.2020, it should now be read that the application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed. In case any default is committed by the applicant/s in appearing before the concerned trial Court, this order granting bail shall stand cancelled automatically.

¶18

Copy of this order be made a part of M.Cr.C. No. 7493 of 2020.

¶19

Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is disposed off.

¶20

Certified copy of the order today.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge

¶23

Nimmi

Vishal Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Domen @ Domendra Mahala, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shubham Kashyap Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jay Kumar Ghasiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Pushpanjali Jaiswal Vs Tilak Jaiswal

Anjor Das Koshle Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mohamad Aslam Khan Vs Veerendra Kumar