Disposed

Surendra Singh Thakur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC12 Feb 2019WPS/900/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition by a retired teacher regarding non-grant of retiral dues was disposed of based on a prior judgment directing the matter to a government committee for consideration of disputed facts, mandating a specific timeline for the Committee to act.

What did the court decide?

The Office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the constituted Committee within 15 days; the entire exercise to be completed within six months.

Surendra Singh Thakur Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

W.P. (S) No. 900 of 2019

¶5

Surendra Singh Thakur So Late Gopal Singh Thakur, Aged About 65 Years, Retd. Teacher, Ashraydatt Karmashala, Tifra, Block Bilha, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, R/o House No. 9/1050, Omnagar Jarhabhatha Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Director, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Directorate Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

Superintendent, Ashraydatt Karmshala Tifra, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner : None For State : None

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

12/02/2019.

¶16

This case pertains to grievance of non-grant of retiral dues and pension.

¶17

This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 ( Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, had directed the

¶18

¶19

Committee to consider the matter of retrial dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No. 105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31^st January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2004 [(Baijnath Mandal (supra)] as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶20

This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the Office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case of the petitioner to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass an order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

The petitioner shall supply one complete set of writ petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for the Accountant General for transferring the same to the Committee.

¶22

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE

¶23

Bhola

Surendra Singh Thakur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Singh Thakur v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rekha Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs C R Masih

Smt. Badrika Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Lakhan Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Hemlata Thakur Vs State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Medical Education Department

Bharatram Sahu Vs the Collector