Petitioner challenged withdrawal of increment due to lack of B.Ed/D.Ed qualification. Court disposed of petition, directing respondents to examine claim per earlier order in Jayant Kumar Patle case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 78 of 2019
Smt. Arundhanti Sahu W/o Kirti Kumar Sahu Aged About 39 Years Posted As Lecturer Panchayat, Government High School Tendua, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
| 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Th Development Department, Chhattisgarh. |
Versus rough The Mahanadi |
---- Petitioner Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur |
|---|---|---|
| 2. Chief Executive Officer, Chhattisgarh. |
Zila Panc | hayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur ---Respondents |
| For Petitioner : |
Mr. Basa | nt Kaiwartya, Advocate |
| For State : |
Mr. Arvin | d Dubey,Panel Lawyer |
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
09/01/2019
-2-
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ petition regarding withdrawal of increment based on non-payment of B.Ed/D.Ed examination fee
Smt. Arundhanti Sahu W/o Kirti Kumar Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh Th Development Department Chhattisgarh
Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh Zila Panc hay at Bilaspur District Bilaspur
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
