The High Court directed the State to allow a Guest Faculty member to continue in service where no specific writ petition opposed her appointment, dismissing the writ petition challenging a blanket ban on such appointments.
The writ petition stands disposed off; the petitioner is allowed to continue in service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 77 of 2019
Ku. Kalpana Pali W/o Shri S.N. Sharma Aged About 29 Years Guest Faculty (Zoology) At Govt. Naveen College Kui Kukdur, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, 491559, R/o Rajmahal Colony Bodla Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 491995
---- Petitioner
Versus
---Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Chandradeep Prasad, Advocate For State : Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
09/01/2019
-2-
-3-
the petitioner is still by virtue of appointment granted to her continuing in
service, her services should not be discontinued.
Sd/-
(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be allowed to continue in service as Guest Faculty despite a State order directing non-appointment of such faculty.
Whether the Court must treat the State order as a measure to avoid contempt of Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPS No. 4938/2018Referred¶17
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ku. Kalpana Pali
State Of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
