A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPS No. 2694 of 2015
Soumitr Shrivastava -Versus- State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
| 23/07/2019 | Mr. Neeraj Choubey , Advocate for the petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A. and Ms. Pushpa Dwivedi, Advocates for the respective respondents. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has since expired and therefore the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. |
|
| Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Ved
Soumitr Shrivastava
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
