Returned a writ petition regarding retirement grievances filed over three years after retirement. The court noted the grievance dated back to 1990 while the petitioner retired in 2016, finding inordinate delay and laches.
The writ petition was rejected on the ground of delay and laches.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 4838 of 2019
N. K. Dubey S/o Late Shri Bala Prasad Dubey Aged About 65 Years Occupation Sub Inspector (M) Retired Under The Office Of Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Raipur, R/o A-5, Vinayak Sadan Panchvati Colony, Akrity Vihar Amlidih, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Anand Kesharwani, Advocate. For State : Shri Arvind Dubey, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
22.07.2019
-2-
back by a period prior to 1990. The petitioner retired in the year 2016. From 1990 to 2016 the petitioner seems to be not aggrieved by any adverse orders or action that went against him or atleast except for the representation that he had made, he has not pursued it seriously at any point of time.
Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Rohit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition concerning retirement grievances filed three years after retirement, where the grievance dates back to prior to 1990, suffers from inordinate delay and laches and must be rejec
N. K. Dubey
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Affairs
The Secretary, (Home) Finance Department
The Director General Of Police
The Additional Director General Of Police (Adminitration)
O.P. Verma
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
