Single judge WPCR order directing police to register an FIR against a company and its directors upon receipt of a complaint regarding investment fraud. The court clarified that the petitioner's potential involvement does not negate the mandatory recording of the offence.
Directed police to lodge FIR; case disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 95 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Achal Kumar Matre, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri R.K. Bhagat, Dy. GA for the State
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
19/02/2019
2
Sd/-
Goutam Bhaduri Judge
Ashu
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the police is obliged to register an FIR upon receipt of a complaint cognizable under law.
What scope FIR registration has regarding the role of the complainant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and othersReferred¶21
_Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others {(2014) 2 SCC 1}_ · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
