The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a second bail application challenging the grant of regular bail to an accused involved in a suspected murder case, noting that the trial court must decide witness evidence.
The second bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 888 of 2019
Ramesh Dewangan S/o Vipta Ram Panika Aged About 22 Years R/o Savtar, Police Station Pratappur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.
--- Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station Kotwali, Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh --- Respondent
For the applicant : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
19.02.2019
2
possession of present applicant and Akhilesh Vishwakarma and also the screw driver which was used during the murder was recovered.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the applicant in connection with charges of murder.
Whether the seizure of property alone is sufficient ground to grant bail despite lack of prosecution witness support.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh Dewangan
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
