The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petitioner's writ petition for want of prosecution due to the absence of instructions from counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 34 of 2017
Mamta Sahu, W/o Late Shashikant Sahu, aged about 30 years, R/o Village Dabripara, Police Station & Tahsil Charama, District : Kanker (C.G.)
----Petitioner
Versus
Both respondents No. 9 & 10 are R/o C-1, C-2, M.P. Nagar, Korba, District : Korba (C.G.)
--Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Gurudeo I. Sharan, Advocate. For State : Mr. Anant Bajapi, PL
2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/05/2019
this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
3
Mamta Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
Superintendent of Police, Korba
Siyaram Patel
Bhagwat Prasad Rathore
Dewa Singh Ayam
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
