This High Court order held that the two criminal miscellaneous petitions (WPCR No. 76 of 2014 and CRMP No. 746 of 2013) became infructuous with the passage of time and dismissed them accordingly.
Both criminal miscellaneous petitions stand dismissed as infructuous with passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPCR No. 76 of 2014
Meharchand Nayak, S/o Shri Minketan Nayak, aged about 73 years, Caste- Aghariya, R/o Village Khaira, P.O. Pandhi, P.S. Seepat, Tahsil and District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
CRMP No. 746 of 2013
Tularam Patel, S/o Late Dhajaram Patel, Aged about 32 years, R/o Village Khaira, Post Pandhi Police Station Seepat, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---Petitioner
---- Respondents
| For Petitioners | : Mr. Prateek Sharma and Mr. Sourabh |
|---|---|
| Sharma, Advocates | |
| For State | : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel,G.A. |
2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
01/05/2019
Procedure have become infructuous with passage of time.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petitions are infructuous having become time-barred.
Meharchand Nayak
Tularam Patel
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
