A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The petitioner counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous, leading to its dismissal without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 269 of 2014
Dr. Chandramani Bareth S/o Shri B.P. Bareth Aged About 28 Years R/o Neta Ji Chowk, Janjgir, Beside Bank Of Baroda, Ps Janjgir, Distt Janjgir, Champa, C.G.
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| 14/05/2019 | Shri Shikhar Bhaktiyar, counsel for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A for the State. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. |
|
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
|
| Jyoti |
Dr. Chandramani Bareth
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretry, Department Of Health, Mahanadi Mantralaya, New Raipur
Goutam Bhaduri
Jyoti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
