In WPC No. 163 of 2019, the petitioner failed to appear or file representation on the date of hearing. The Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution due to this non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 163 of 2019
Ku. Ritika Mazumdar D/o Ranjeet Mazumdar Aged About 20 Years R/o LIG 229, HUDCO Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| 14/05/2019 | None for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Neeraj Choubey, Counsel for the Respondents. | |
| Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. |
|
| Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|
| Jyoti | Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Ku. Ritika Mazumdar
Hemchand Yadav University
Vice Chancellor, Hemchand Yadav University
Principal St. Thomas College
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
