Held that the writ petition challenging the letter of intent for an LPG dealership became infructuous as the allotment was subsequently made and is pending in another writ petition. Dismissed petition.
Petitioner directed to raise all grounds of challenge in WPC No.786/2014 which is pending.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1150 of 2013
Doodhnath Patel S/o Shri Lakshyaram Patel Aged About 40 Years R/o New Mangal Bazar, Gudhiyari, PS Gudhiyari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For petitioner – Shri Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 3- Shri Anand Shukla, Advocate. For respondent No.4- Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
02/07/2019
Heard.
already covered which is under challenge in WPC No.786/2014.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition challenging the letter of intent becomes infructuous when the allotment is made under challenge in a related petition.
Whether the court should dismiss the petition as infructuous allowing petitioner to raise grounds in the pending related petition.
Doodhnath Patel
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
Pawan Kumar Agrawal
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
