Writ petition filed for purposes not evident from the order. Petitioner absent from hearing despite calls to court. Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 1312 of 2014
Sati Sakti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Samiti Village Loharsi Son Tahsil Masturi Distt. Bilaspur Through President Kausilya Bai W/o Gangaprasad Age About 45 Yrs R/o Village Loharsi Son Tahs Masturi Civil &d Revenue Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner
Versus
| 01.07.2019 R a o |
No one appears for the petitioner when the matter is called even in second round. Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer, for the State- Respondents. Since no one appears to argue the case on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated call, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE |
|---|
Sati Sakti Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Samiti Village Loharsi Son Tahsil Masturi Distt. Bilaspur Through President Kausilya Bai W/o Gangaprasad
State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture (Fisheries), Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur
The Collector Bilaspur Distt. Bilaspur
The Director, Department of Fisheries Directorate Nava Raipur
The Chief Executive Officer Matsya Krishak Vikash Abhikaran
Fisheries Inspector Block Masturi Tah Masturi
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
