In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioners challenged the initiation of execution proceedings against them despite a pending miscellaneous appeal before the High Court. The court held that there is no bar to execution during the pendency of the appeal if no stay has been granted and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 555 of 2019
--- Respondents
For Petitioners : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
12.07.2019
2
Tribunal against the petitioners in M.A.C.T. Execution No. 03/2018, being aggrieved of which the petitioners have preferred this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an award pending appeal before the High Court can be executed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
Tarachand Patel
Ritesh Patel
Shashikala Patel
Sunil Kumar Patel
I.C.I.C.I. Lombard, General Insurance Company
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
