The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the second appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant's counsel had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SA No. 178 of 2006
Bundia Bai D/o Pilaram, aged about 76 years, R/o Garhumariya, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---Appellant
Versus
All are R/o Amlipali, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
11/07/2019
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
Bundia Bai D/o Pilaram
Chitki D/o Pilaram
Tiharu S/o Pilaram
Kushwa S/o Pilaram
Lalit S/o Pilaram
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
