The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a second appeal for want of prosecution due to the appellant's absence and lack of representation during the hearing.
The second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 50 of 2006
---- Appellant
Versus
1.10 - (J). Minakshi W/o Geetaram Aged About 26 Years R/o Taktoya, Post Kodwa Godan, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
For Appellant/ Plaintiff : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
23.07.2019
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Vishakha
Banshilal S/o Shri Sunder Satnami
Sumrit Bai wd/o late shri Rekhchand
Bhumchand S/o Late Rekhchand
Fulchand S/o Late Rekhchand
Yogeshwar Chand S/o Late Rekhchand
Nilchand S/o Late Rekhchand
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
