The second appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant's learned counsel had no instructions in the matter on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No.237 of 2005
Smt. Pushpadevi, W/o Purushottam Das Agrawal, aged about 30 years, Occupation House work, R/o Patthalgaon, Tah. Patthalgaon, Distt. Raigarh, M.P. (now C.G.)
(Plaintiff) ---- Appellant
Versus
(Defendants) ---- Respondents
For Appellant: Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 10: None present. For Respondent No.11 / State: Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Deputy Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
22/07/2019
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
Smt. Pushpadevi, W/o Purushottam Das Agrawal and others
State of M.P. (now C.G.) and others
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
