Disposed

Shesh Rao @ Golu Mohite v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC20 Feb 2019MCRC/917/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was disposed of granting interim bail. The High Court directed that if the applicant furnishes two solvent sureties and one personal bond, he shall be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC, subject to conditions against re-offending.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to two solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each and a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/-.

Shesh Rao @ Golu Mohite Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 917 of 2019

¶5

Shesh Rao @ Golu Mohite S/o Shri Prakash Rao Mohite Aged About 18 Years R/o Bhathapara ,fafadih Raipur ,tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Mo. No. 7974339217, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Ganj ,raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For the Applicant : Ms. Sunita Sahu, Advocate For the State : Shri SRJ Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

20/02/2019

¶13

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶14

Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.312/2018 registered at Police Station Ganj, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 457, 380 of IPC.

¶15

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that in the intervening night of 19/10/2018 and 20/10/2018 from the house of complainant Raja Turkesh situated at Fafadih Bhatapara, some unknown persons stolen mobile set IMEI No. 887871031943109, mobile set of Redmi company IMEI No.89644535035176, another mobile set IMEI No. 911575000171560, three other mobile set. On the memorandum of applicant one mobile set IMEI No. 887871031943109 and another mobile set of Redmi company IMEI No.89644535035176 were seized from him.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

¶18

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, it is directed that if the applicant furnishes two solvent sureties for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- each along with one personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned with the condition that he will not involve himself in such type of crime in future, he shall be released on bail.

¶19

Certified copy as per rules.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶22

Kamde

Shesh Rao @ Golu Mohite v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shesh Rao @ Golu Mohite v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasudev Sande & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prem Nirmalkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandra Prakash Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nitesh @ Tinni Nayak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sangeet Sonwani Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vikas @ Vikki Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh