Allowed

Vasudev Sande & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Feb 2019MCRC/475/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail applications of two individuals arrested for possession of cannabis under the NDPS Act, directing them to provide solvent sureties and personal bonds before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed subject to furnishing one solvent surety for Rs. 25,000/- and one personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Vasudev Sande & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Narcotics (NDPS) | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCR MCRC No. 475 of 2019

¶5

Vasudev Sande S/o Chaitu Sande Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Dhorkachhar, Thana - Sankara, Tahsil - Pithora, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶6

Anil Sidar S/o Niranjan Sidar Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Dhorkachhar, Thana - Sankara, Tahsil - Pithora, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶7

---- Applicant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Station House Officer, Police Station - Sankara, District - Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶10

t Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Non Applicant For the Applicant : Shri Vikash Pradhan, Advocate For the State : Shri SRJ Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

19/02/2019

¶14

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶15

The applicants have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 03/2019 registered at Police Station- Sankara, District- Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20(B) of NDPS Act.

¶16

Argument heard.

¶17

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 07.01.2019 Inspector Veena Yadav posted at Police Station Sankara, seized 4.050 Kg cannabis from the possession of the applicant No.1 Vasudev Sande and two notes of denomination hundred rupees from the possession of the applicant No.2, Anil Sidar who accompanied to applicant No.1.

¶18

Counsel for the State submits that there is no criminal antecedent of the applicant is reported in police case diary.

¶19

Looking to the above facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. It is directed that if each applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned, he be released on bail.

¶20

Certified copy as per rules.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶23

Parul

Vasudev Sande & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasudev Sande & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Dewangan & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kailash Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sagar Wahane Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Prem Nirmalkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chandra Prakash Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Surendra Chandrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh