Dismissed

Saroj Banjare v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC22 Jan 2019MCRC/8246/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order rejects the first bail application for an applicant in a Section 307 IPC case. The High Court, noting the grave injuries to the victim and the seriousness of the charge, refused bail due to the risk to society, despite arguments regarding lack of criminal background and length of incarceration.

What did the court decide?

Application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. rejected; separate contempt proceedings directed against the non-appearance of the Investigating Officer.

Saroj Banjare Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 8246 of 2018

¶5

Saroj Banjare S/o Sabad Banjare Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Levai, Police Station- Balouda, Tahsil- Balouda, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Bankimongra, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Non-applicant

¶10

For Applicant : Shri Nitesh Shrivas, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Shri Sangeeta Mishra, Govt. Advocate

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board

¶12

22.01.2019

¶13

Case diary produced by Shri Rajkumar Vindhyaraj, Police Constable, P.S. Bankimongra, Korba. Concerned Investigating Officer not present in person though Court has directed on 14.01.2019 to appear him in person.

¶14

ARJ is directed to initiate separate contempt proceeding against the said Investigating Officer.

¶15

Heard on bail application.

¶16

This is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶17

Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with crime No. 234/2011 registered at Police Station – Bankimongra, District- Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that complainant Durga Bai is the wife of the applicant. On 10.12.2010 about 1:00 pm at Banki Mongra in his house, applicant caused injuries on the abdomen of the complainant by knife.

¶19

As per the MLC report of complainant two stabbed wounds were found on the abdomen of the complainant which were grievous in nature.

¶20

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has no criminal background, he is innocent, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

¶21

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶22

Counsel for the applicant further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 13.09.2018, trial will take its own time, thus he may be released on bail.

¶23

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the injuries of the complainant, looking to the seriousness of the offence, looking to the impact of granting bail to the applicant on society, the present bail application is rejected.

¶24

Certified copy as per rules.

¶25

The MCRC is disposed off with aforesaid directions.

¶26

Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE

¶27

kishore

Saroj Banjare v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Banjare v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Leel Sai and Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dalu @ Prahlad Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Sinha Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Vishwanath Bhasker Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Komal Goswami (Kamar) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jethuram Dhidhi Vs State of Chhattisgarh