This order heard a second bail application accused of manufacturing country liquor. The judge dismissed the petition noting no change in circumstances prior to two criminal cases. Mere turning of witnesses was held insufficient for bail.
The bail application is dismissed in the second round.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 222 of 2019
Dalu @ Prahlad Yadav S/o Late Jaykumar Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Mopka ,thana Sarkanda ,district Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Sarkanda District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri A.K. Yadav, Advocate For the State : Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
21/01/2019
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is sufficient change of circumstances to warrant grant of bail in a second application for the same offence.
Whether the turning of seizure witnesses constitutes sufficient ground to enlarge the accused on bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dalu @ Prahlad Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
