The application, filed by three accused persons, seeking permission to withdraw pending proceedings, was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court at the instance of the applicants who had secured liberty to revive the matter subsequently.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
M.Cr.C. No. 5124 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| 24/09/2019 | Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate for the applicants. Shri Devendra Pratap Singh, Dy. A.G. for the State. Shri Banhiman Roy, Advocate for the Objector. Learned counsel for the applicants seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to revive the same after examination of the main witnesses. With the aforesaid liberty, this M.Cr.C. is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|---|---|
| Sd/- | |
| (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
Nimmi
Dinesh Sahu
Umesh Kumar Patel
Kunjbihari Kodaku
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
