Allowed

Jai @ Jinendra Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC24 Sept 2019MCRC/5096/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by an accused in a cheating case involving false implication and lack of criminal antecedents. The applicant was released on a personal bond with one surety.

What did the court decide?

The application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the li

Jai @ Jinendra Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheating and Forgery | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 5096 of 2019

¶5

Jai @ Jinendra Dewangan S/o Mahesh Dewangan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Mahud (A), Thana Arjunda, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Gunderdehi, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

¶9

----Non-applicant

¶10

For Applicant – Mr. Rohitashwa Singh, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State – Ms. Akansha Jain, Deputy Govt. Advocate.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board

¶12

24-09-2019

¶13

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 03-04-2019 in connection with Crime No.126/2019 registered at P.S. - Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 420 of the IPC.

¶14

2 . It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in jail since 03-04-2019. No offence has been committed by the applicant. The investigation has been completed and charge sheet has been filed. Therefore, it is prayed that the application may be allowed.

¶15

3 . Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶17

According to the prosecution case, this applicant induced the complainant that he can use his influence for getting the complainant appointed as Constable in CAF and received Rs.2,70,000/- in cash as illegal gratification. Hence, this case.

¶18

-2-

¶19

Considering that the case is now pending for trial and the fact that this applicant does not have any criminal antecedent, therefore, I feel inclined to allow this application.

¶20

Consequently, this application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

¶21

8 . Certified copy as per rules.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge

¶24

Aadil

Jai @ Jinendra Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jai @ Jinendra Dewangan v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarzen Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rishi Kumar Rautiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mukesh Kumar Sen (Nai) Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sonu Das & Anr. Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Raghvendra Vanshkar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Sahu & Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh