In this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 489-B and 34 IPC, the High Court rejected the plea that hostile testimony of seizure witnesses warranted release, holding no change in circumstances justified liberty.
Second bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4086 of 2019
Hira Singh Dhruv, S/o Shri Panchram Dhruv, aged about 30 years, R/o Village Bandora, P.S. Tumgaon, District Mahasamund (CG).
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Rakhi, District Raipur (CG).
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
01.08.2019
2
application. However, she submits that there is no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicant in police case diary.
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
L/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail on the grounds that seizure witnesses turned hostile in the trial court.
Whether there has been any change in circumstances to justify granting bail in the second bail application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Hira Singh Dhruv
State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
