Shabnam Bee v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Held an appeal for bail under Section 439 of the CrPC in a case involving possession of a huge quantity of cannabis under the NDPS Act was rejected due to the seriousness of the offence.
What did the court decide?
The applicant was not released on bail.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4058 of 2019
- Shabnam Bee D/o Shri Fulsingh Ahirwar Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Ritehari, Tahsil Basauda, District Vidisha Madhya Pradesh., District : Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh
---- Applicant
Versus
- State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Khallari, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh
---- Non-applicant
| For Applicant | : Mr. Manish Thakur, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Non-applicant | : Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant charged with possession of cannabis under Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shabnam Bee D/o Shri Fulsingh Ahirwar
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Sharad Kumar Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/4058/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court