The high court considered a petition where counsel for the applicant submitted that the underlying trial had concluded. The court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it accordingly without further adjudication on merits. No substantive relief was granted.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; no further relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 2030 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, Advocate For State/respondent : Mr. Aditya Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
22/07/2019
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nisha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of as infructuous given the conclusion of the trial against the applicant.
Toman Prasad Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station-Shivrinarayan
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
