The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected this first bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The applicant, accused of rape and house trespass, claimed innocence citing prosecutrix contradictions. The court found the statement supported the prosecution and denied bail.
Regular bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1258 of 2019
| ---- Applicant Versus |
|---|
| • State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police-Station- Jhilmili, District-Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent |
| _____________________________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr.Aditya Chopda, Advocate. |
| For Respondent/State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
22/07/2019
Page No.2
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant)
Judge
Nisha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the prosecution charges of rape and house trespass.
Whether contradictions in the prosecutrix's cross-examination justify granting bail before the trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayan Paikra
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police-Station-Jhilmili
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
