Afatab Siddiqui & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur reserved and delivered an order rejecting two first bail applications of a moneylender and a businessman accused of cheating and forgery by manipulating sale deeds and bank accounts.
What did the court decide?
Regular bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in M.Cr.C. Nos. 1080 and 1087 of 2019 are rejected.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Reserved on : 01/07/2019
Order Delivered on : 18/07/2019
M.Cr.C. No. 1080 of 2019
Arif Ahmed Qureshi S/o Late Shri Mumtaz Ahmed Qureshi Aged About 47 Years R/o Noorani Chowk Rajatalab, P. S. Civil Lines, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
And
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to applicants accused of levying large sums via forged sale deeds and manipulated bank transactions.
Whether the applicants should be granted bail given the high level of conspiracy, charges of cheating, and the fact that the investigation is still pending.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arif Ahmed Qureshi
- applicant
Afatab Siddiqui
- applicant
Abdul Gani
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/1087/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court