Allowed

Vishal Vivek Mukharjee v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Jul 2019MCRC/3289/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Chhattisgarh considered whether to grant bail to an applicant accused of rape attempt and cheating. The court found the case to be fit for granting bail and ordered release subject to a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Bail application allowed; applicant to be released on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of like sum.

Vishal Vivek Mukharjee Vs the State of Chhattisgarh — Caste Atrocities | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

M.CR.C. No. 3289 of 2019

¶5

Vishal Vivek Mukharjee, S/o. Shri Banshodhar @ Banshidhar Mukharjee, Aged About 32 Years, Occupation -Temporary Service, R/o. Village Jawahar Nagar, P.S. Balrampur, Tahsil Ramanujganj, District- Balrampur, Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Station House Officer, Police Station- AJAK, Balrampur, Tahsil Ramanujganj, Disrtict- BalrampurRamanujganj, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicant : Mr. Neeraj Mehta, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Aditya Sharma, P.L.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

17/07/2019

¶14

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.5/2019, registered at Police Station –AJAK Balrampur, District – Balrampur – Ramanujganj (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (N), 313, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (2) (5) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989.

¶15

¶16

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the applicant. The applicant is in jail since 10.04.2019. The prosecutrix is major woman of age 29 years. In fact the applicant and the prosecutrix both have a relation since the year 2013 and as the applicant has refused to marry her that is why, she has lodged FIR making false allegation. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicant be granted regular bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submissions made in this respect.

¶18

I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.

¶19

According to the FIR lodged, the applicant met with the prosecutrix in the year 2013 and then he promised that he will marry her and established physical relation, which continued for sometime and thereafter, the applicant has refused to marry her that is why, the allegation has been made that the applicant has raped the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage.

¶20

Considered on the submissions made and the contents of the case diary. After considering on all the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶22

¶23

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

¶24

Certified copy as per rules.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge

¶27

Balram

Vishal Vivek Mukharjee v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Vivek Mukharjee v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangal Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Amit Ram Vishwakarma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Laxman Kumar Jangde Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Sahu and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jitendra Kumar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoj Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh