The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed this mortgage appeal for non-statutory reasons. The appellant failed to pay the requisite court fee, rendering the appeal not entertainable under proviso to Section 173.
The appeal was dismissed as it was held not entertainable due to non-payment of the requisite court fee of Rs. 25,000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MAC No. 531 of 2019
Harpal Singh S/o Mahender Singh Aged About 40 Years R/o Vikas Nagar Kusmunda, Qtr. No. B - 81, Police Station Kusmunda, District Korba Chhattisgarh. (Driver ) (Non - Applicant No. 1), ---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For the Appellant:
Shri Govind Ram Miri, Advocate
Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board
16.07.2019
Sd/-
(Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE
vivek
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be entertained when the requisite court fee has not been paid despite prior notices directing payment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harpal Singh
Vishram Prasad Verma
Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
