Disposed

Smt. Veena Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Chhattisgarh HC8 Apr 2019CRMP/315/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to consider the petitioner's objection regarding the maintainability of proceedings under Section 145 of the CrPC within two weeks, with a final decision within six weeks, while keeping an interim order in operation.

What did the court decide?

Directed SDM to consider objection on maintainability within two weeks and decide within six weeks; interim order to remain in operation.

Smt. Veena Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr. — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Cr.M.P.No.315 of 2013

¶5

Smt.Veena Singh Wd/o Late Shri Naveen Singh, aged about -37 years, R/o Bhishma Aushadhalaya Evam Cancer Chikitshalaya Raipura, Tahsil & Distt.-Raipur (CG)

¶6

--- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, Through-the Station In-charge, Police Station-D.D. Nagar, Raipur (CG)

¶9

Vaidharaj Durga Singh S/o Late Shri Arjun Singh, aged about-42 years, R/o Shankar Mandir Chauk, Nayapara, Raipur, Police Station-Gol Bazar, Distt.-Raipur (CG)

¶10

--- Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent No.1 : Mr.Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Dy.G.A.
For Respondent No.2 : Mr.Shantam Awasthi, Advocate

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

08/04/2019

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has raised an objection before the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Nagar), Raipur that proceeding under Section 125 of the CrPC is not maintainable, that has not been considered and decided till this date, therefore, the petitioner may be allowed to raise a fresh objection and that may be directed to be decided by the SubDivisional Magistrate (Nagar), Raipur expeditiously.

¶16

Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for the private respondent submit that though proceeding under Section 145 of the CrPC is maintainable.

¶17

Be that as it may, the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate is directed to consider the petitioner's objection that whether

¶18

¶19

proceeding under Section 145 of the CrPC is maintainable or not, if raised by the petitioner, within two weeks from today and that will be decided within further six weeks and during this period, interim order dated 4.4.2013 shall remain in operation.

¶20

With the aforesaid observation, the CrMP stands disposed of.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶23

B/-

Smt. Veena Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Veena Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Sharma And Anr. Vs Mukesh Kumar Agrawal And Ors.

Ashok Kumar Paul Vs Vidya Shankar Aditya and Anr.

Krishnadutt Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jila Sahkari Krishi Gramin Vikas Bank Ltd. Vs Satyadev Mishra And Ors.

Ramnarayan Shrivas Vs State Of C.g. and Anr.

Vinod Kumar Rathi Vs Sharad Chhitlangia