A two-judge bench of the Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed two Criminal Reference cases as having become infructuous upon hearing that submissions made by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 828 of 2012
---- Petitioners
Versus
Both are residents of Banki Mongra, P.S. Banki Mongra, Tahsil Katghora, Distt.- Korba, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
CRR No. 606 of 2012
Both are residents of Banki Mongra, P.S. Banki Mongra, Tahsil Katghora, Distt.- Korba, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
2
For Petitioners : Mr. S.R.J Jaiswal, Advocate and Mr. Sunil Sahu, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
05/04/19
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Harneet
Mukesh Kumar Agarwal and Yogesh Kumar Agarwal
Sunil Kumar Sharma, Pawan Kumar Sharma, and State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
