The High Court dismissed the petition as it had become infructuous, holding that no substantive adjudication was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Cr.M.P. No. 283 of 2014
Poshan Lal S/o Vishnu Prasad Chandrakar, aged about 37 years, R/o Nevai Basti, Police Station – Nevai, Civil and Revenue District Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
For Applicant : Shri Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
17/01/2019
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE
Priyanka
Poshan Lal S/o Vishnu Prasad Chandrakar
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Kumar S/o Late Shankar Lal
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
