The petitioner sought extension of time to deposit compensation ordered in 2012. The High Court held it could not exceed its power to extend time under Section 482 CrPC and dismissed the petition at the admission stage.
Apartojected to fix time for deposit of compensation and petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 98 of 2019
Chaitram, S/o. Phool Singh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o. Village- Bade Dumarpali, Police Station & Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The District Magistrate Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Patel, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anant Bajpai, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
16.01.2019
Heard
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Ashok
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chaitram, S/o. Phool Singh
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
