State Of Chhattisgarh v. Jamuna Yadav
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh condoned a 42-day delay in filing a leave to appeal application. Considering that the trial court had acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 498-A and 304-B due to insufficient evidence regarding dowry demands, the court was not inclined to grant leave to appeal and dismissed the Cr.M.P.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 42 days condoned; Leave to appeal rejected; Cr.M.P. dismissed.
What the court decided
1
CRMP No. 182 of 2018
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 182 of 2018
- State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
- Jamuna Yadav S/o Janjgi Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Dharmi (Parsakhad), Police Station Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
- Devrup Yadav S/o Jamuna Yadav Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Dharmi (Parsakhad), Police Station Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
- Ramkeshwar Yadav S/o Jamuna Yadav Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Dharmi (Parsakhad), Police Station Ramchandrapur, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal against the acquittal should be granted.
Whether the delay of 42 days in filing the leave to appeal application should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Ramchandrapur
- respondent
Jamuna Yadav
- respondent
Devrup Yadav
- respondent
Ramkeshwar Yadav
- respondent
Devchand Yadav
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMP/182/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court