The court held that no case for leave to appeal was made out because the trial court correctly acquitted the respondent due to the prosecutrix's inconsistent statements. The appeal was dismissed.
The CRMP is dismissed; leave to appeal is not granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRMP No. 1318 of 2019
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1318 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner/State
Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer
DB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order On Board By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
17/7/2019
2
CRMP No. 1318 of 2019
Sd/- Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya)
Judge Judge
Shyna
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecution case was proved beyond reasonable doubt given the prosecutrix's inconsistent statements.
Whether notice of appeal is required before granting leave to appeal.
Whether the trial court's acquittal should be set aside on the facts of the case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Parpa District Bastar
Nitesh Chauhan
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
