Dismissed

Vijay Babu Dwivedi v. Shri D. K. Agrawal

Chhattisgarh HC28 Nov 2019CONT/902/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition regarding alleged non-compliance of a previous order, the court accepted the respondents submission that the confirmation case was placed before a committee with a sealed cover to be opened pending a departmental enquiry. The petition was disposed of holding the order duly complied with.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition stands disposed of with the respondents held to have duly complied with the Court's order.

Vijay Babu Dwivedi Vs Shri D. K. Agrawal — Contempt of Court | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

CONT No. 902 of 2019

¶5

Vijay Babu Dwivedi, S/o Late Shri Dharamdash Dwivedi, Aged About 57 Years, R/o M.I.G. Q. No. 05, Junior Keshar Awas, Near Aryan School, Rajkishore Nagar, Police Station-Sarkanda, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Shri D. K. Agrawal, Public Works Department, North Block, Sector19, Construction Building, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

Shri A.K. Mandhan, Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Zone Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

–-----Respondents

¶11

For Applicant : Mr. S.P. Kale, Advocate For State : Mrs. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶13

28.11.2019

¶14

The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging noncompliance of the Order dated 12.04.2019 passed in WPS No. 2790 of 2019.

¶15

The respondents have entered appearance and have filed their reply and in their reply, they have categorically stated that in compliance of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court, the case of the petitioner/applicant for confirmation was placed before a committee and the committee in its meeting held on 13.11.2019 have placed its recommendation in a sealed cover envelope, on account of the fact that a departmental enquiry against the petitioner was pending. The

¶16

-2-

¶17

authorities have further passed an order that, the sealed cover regarding confirmation, shall be opened immediately on the outcome of the departmental enquiry pending against the petitioner/applicant.

¶18

Given the said reply by the respondents supported with the documents dated 14.11.2019, this Court is of the opinion that the order passed by this Hon'ble Court stands duly complied-with.

¶19

However, in case in the event if the petitioner/applicant is aggrieved of the action or decision on the part of the respondents, he would be at liberty to challenge the same afresh, if he so chooses.

¶20

The present Contempt Petition, accordingly stands disposed off.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶23

Rahul

Vijay Babu Dwivedi v. Shri D. K. Agrawal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Babu Dwivedi v. Shri D. K. Agrawal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omprakash Singhare Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Petram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Makhan Lal Joshi Vs Mr. D.D. Singh

Paras Lal Verma Vs Smt. Shanti Verma

Hemlal Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lala Ram Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh