Disposed

Petram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC27 Nov 2019WPC/3706/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Chhattisgarh High Court directed the Sub Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer to decide the petitioner's compensation application within 60 days after the Revenue Inspector submitted the report.

What did the court decide?

The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer to pass an appropriate order on the application for payment of compensation within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order.

Petram Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Land Acquisition | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 3706 of 2019

¶5

Petram S/o Shri Thakur Ram Aged About 45 Years Agriculturist, R/o Village Lat, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

The Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Land Acquisition Officer (Revenue) Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

The Managing Director South East Coalfields Limited, Raigarh Circle, Atarmuda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner	: Mr. Vineet Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For State	: Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.
For Respondent No.4	: Mr. Vinod Deshmukh ,Advocate

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶15

27/11/2019

¶16

At the outset, the petitioner in the present writ petition seeks for an appropriate direction to the respondent No.3 for taking a decision in respect of the application that the petitioner has filed for grant of compensation against the land belonging to the petitioner. The details of the property are reflected in the application as well as in the report submitted by the Revenue Inspector.

¶17

According to the petitioner, the Sub-Divisional Officer on taking cognizance of the application had directed the Revenue Inspector to submit his report and which the Revenue Inspector has also done, however thereafter the respondent No.3 has not passed any further orders.

¶18

¶19

Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would serve if the respondent No.3 is directed to pass an appropriate order on the application for payment of compensation to the petitioner against the land which has been acquired by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

¶20

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶22

Ved

Petram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Petram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Durg Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Janardan Giri Vs Girdhari Nayak

Parmeshwar Prasad Gupta Vs Ku. Rita Shandilya, (Secretary)

Omprakash Singhare Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Makhan Lal Joshi Vs Mr. D.D. Singh

Dinesh Kumar Bhagoria Vs Shri Champawat Avinash